Managing Actuarial Gains and Losses in Financial Reporting

Deviations between expected and actual outcomes may necessitate adjustments to contribution levels or reserves to ensure the financial sustainability of these arrangements. Some employee benefits are provided regardless of the reason for the employee’s departure. The payment of such benefits is certain (subject to any vesting or minimum service requirements) but the timing of their payment is uncertain. Although such benefits are described in some jurisdictions as termination indemnities or termination gratuities, they are post‑employment benefits rather than termination benefits, and an entity accounts for them as post‑employment benefits. The measurement of other long‑term employee benefits is not usually subject to the same degree of uncertainty as the measurement of post‑employment benefits. For this reason, this Standard requires a simplified method of accounting for other long‑term employee benefits.

However, the employer’s obligation is not limited to an amount it agrees to contribute to the fund. By contrast, under a defined contribution plan (e.g. 401k plans), an employer makes fixed cash contributions to a fund and has no further obligation to the employee in the event of any shortfall in the fund at the time benefits are due. For insurance companies, actuaries calculate the expected amount of claims the company may need to pay out to policyholders within a specific period.

actuarial gains and losses

Unraveling the Complexities of Actuarial Gains and Losses: An In-Depth Examination of IAS 19

Moreover, changes in population size can affect the frequency and severity of certain events, such as natural disasters. Under U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), actuarial gains and losses are recorded through other comprehensive income, which does not flow directly to the income statement. However, under IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards), these gains and losses are also reported in other comprehensive income but are not amortized. Actuarial gains occur when actual experience is more favorable than expected, resulting in a reduction in the plan’s liabilities or an increase in the plan’s assets. Conversely, actuarial losses occur when actual experience is less favorable than expected, leading to an increase in the plan’s liabilities or a decrease in the plan’s assets. Navigating the reporting standards and requirements for actuarial gains and losses demands a thorough understanding of the relevant accounting frameworks.

Defined benefit vs. defined contribution plans under IFRS

As required by paragraph 160, the entity accounts for benefits provided in exchange for termination of employment as termination benefits and accounts for benefits provided in exchange for services as short-term employee benefits. Sometimes, an entity is able to look to another party, such as an insurer, to pay part or all of the expenditure required to settle a defined benefit obligation. An entity accounts for qualifying insurance policies in the same way as for all other plan assets and paragraph 116 is not relevant (see paragraphs 46⁠–⁠49 and 115). When a plan amendment, curtailment or settlement occurs, an entity shall recognise and measure any past service cost, or a gain or loss on settlement, in accordance with paragraphs 99⁠–⁠101 and paragraphs 102⁠–⁠112. An entity shall then determine the effect of the asset ceiling after the plan amendment, curtailment or settlement and shall recognise any change in that effect in accordance with paragraph 57(d). In some cases, there may be no deep market in bonds with a sufficiently long maturity to match the estimated maturity of all the benefit payments.

Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications. Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from actuarial gains and losses Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. This involves estimating the date of disbursement for these pension payments and discounting these amounts to their present value.

Disclosure requirements in other IFRSs

A description of the funding arrangements, including the method used to determine the entity’s rate of contributions and any minimum funding requirements. A description of the regulatory framework in which the plan operates, for example the level of any minimum funding requirements, and any effect of the regulatory framework on the plan, such as the asset ceiling (see paragraph 64). Between conditional benefits, amounts attributable to future salary increases and other benefits.

Accounting Standards and Regulations

actuarial gains and losses

An entity need not distinguish between past service cost resulting from a plan amendment, past service cost resulting from a curtailment and a gain or loss on settlement if these transactions occur together. In some cases, a plan amendment occurs before a settlement, such as when an entity changes the benefits under the plan and settles the amended benefits later. In those cases an entity recognises past service cost before any gain or loss on settlement.

In financial statements for periods beginning before 1 January 2014, an entity need not present comparative information for the disclosures required by paragraph 145 about the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation. Some entities provide a lower level of benefit for termination of employment at the request of the employee (in substance, a post‑employment benefit) than for termination of employment at the request of the entity. The difference between the benefit provided for termination of employment at the request of the employee and a higher benefit provided at the request of the entity is a termination benefit. This Standard deals with termination benefits separately from other employee benefits because the event that gives rise to an obligation is the termination of employment rather than employee service. Termination benefits result from either an entity’s decision to terminate the employment or an employee’s decision to accept an entity’s offer of benefits in exchange for termination of employment. Measurement of post‑employment medical benefits requires assumptions about the level and frequency of future claims and the cost of meeting those claims.

  • These gains and losses need to be systematically captured and reported, playing a pivotal role in financial accountability.
  • This loss was also recorded as a non-operating item under comprehensive income and negatively impacted equity.
  • These fluctuations arise from changes in key demographic and economic assumptions used in calculating the projected benefit obligation (PBO), which measures a company’s obligation to provide retirement benefits to its employees.

Under IFRS, these adjustments are recorded through other comprehensive income but are not amortized into the income statement. Enhancement of post‑employment benefits, either indirectly through an employee benefit plan or directly. In recognising and measuring the surplus or deficit in an other long‑term employee benefit plan, an entity shall apply paragraphs 56⁠–⁠98 and 113⁠–⁠115. An entity shall apply paragraphs 116⁠–⁠119 in recognising and measuring any reimbursement right. Current service cost for periods after the change, to the extent that they change benefits for service after the change. In practice, an entity often achieves this by applying a single weighted average discount rate that reflects the estimated timing and amount of benefit payments and the currency in which the benefits are to be paid.

Actuarial assumptions are essential in the insurance industry for predicting future financial outcomes. Actuaries use statistical models and historical data to make assumptions about factors such as mortality rates, interest rates, and investment returns. These assumptions are used to calculate the present value of future obligations and determine the premiums that are required to cover these obligations. However, it is important to understand that these assumptions are not exact predictions and can be subject to error. In defined benefit plans, the employees contribute resources which are managed by their company.

  • The discount rate used to remeasure the net defined benefit liability (asset) in accordance with paragraph 99(b).
  • In this example, discounting is not required, so an expense of CU200,000 (ie CU2,000,000 ÷ 10) is recognised in each month during the service period of ten months, with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the liability.
  • The methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analyses required by (a) and the limitations of those methods.
  • When actuarial gains or losses occur, employers must make actuarial adjustments to reflect changes to their original pension estimates.
  • The reserves are based on projections of the pension benefits a company expects to pay out over time.
  • In the case of accumulating paid absences, when the employees render service that increases their entitlement to future paid absences.

It plays a crucial role in financial reporting, funding requirements, and stakeholder perception. By understanding the concept and its implications, organizations can better manage risks and make informed decisions regarding pension plans and insurance arrangements. The payment of fixed premiums under such contracts is, in substance, the settlement of the employee benefit obligation, rather than an investment to meet the obligation. Therefore, an entity treats such payments as contributions to a defined contribution plan.

When a restriction (eg a legal, regulatory or contractual requirement or other restriction) on the entity’s ability to withdraw the offer takes effect. This would be when the offer is made, if the restriction existed at the time of the offer. Changes from the previous period in the methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analyses, and the reasons for such changes. A description of any other entity’s responsibilities for the governance of the plan, for example responsibilities of trustees or of board members of the plan. The amount of benefit attributed to each period is a constant proportion of the salary to which the benefit is linked.

A description of any funding arrangements and funding policy that affect future contributions. Payments from the plan, showing separately the amount paid in respect of any settlements. Contributions to the plan, showing separately those by the employer and by plan participants. Whether users of financial statements need additional information to evaluate the quantitative information disclosed. Intends either to settle the obligations on a net basis, or to realise the surplus in one plan and settle its obligation under the other plan simultaneously. Employees are entitled to a benefit of 3 per cent of final salary for each year of service before the age of 55.

Actuarial assumptions are an important tool for insurance companies to predict future financial outcomes. To ensure the accuracy of assumptions, actuaries must continually review and update their models based on new data and changing economic conditions. Insurance companies should also conduct sensitivity tests and follow best practices to mitigate risk and provide transparency to stakeholders. And for year 2, the entity must recognize an asset for the excess of plan assets over the present value of the contributions. In this scenario, the company records an actuarial loss of $200,000, impacting its financial position and net income.

‘Remeasurements’ under Ind AS 19 will be covered in a separate post due to be published soon. Imagine a company estimated that 10% of their workforce would retire each year, but only 5% actually retired. This would result in an actuarial gain because the actual turnover was more favorable than expected.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *